(I've put my resources and a link to Mike Mohammed's bingo assessments at the bottom of this post if you want to skip over the discussion.)
When we went to emergency remote learning last spring, our science department elected not to do a formal "exam". Since we were required to provide some kind of summative assessment opportunity, I was really happy I had come across this BINGO video idea from Kevin McChesney of
@TigerPhysics earlier in the year.
I had been planning to adapt it for last year's summative project anyway, but it was perfect for lockdown science once I tweaked it a bit to make it work for our situation: all assessments were optional, and because we are a full-year school (as opposed to semestered), we were only allowed to give a total of 1.5 hours of work a week per course.
They had to choose a row or column, or one of the two diagonals (for the physics only) and create a video/slide-show/portfolio/study guide/something showing how well they understood the topics in that row, column, or diagonal. The more connections they made to things they had learned, the better! (For example, if the topic was Normal Force, I wanted them to talk about how it related to other "topics" such as the force of gravity, the force of friction, Newton's laws of motion, kinetics, etc.) They could hand in different topics at different times, and each topic could use a different medium.
The Rules
- no more than 2 items in each row/column may use material that is not their own work
- if they are using someone else’s video, they may not also use the audio
- each video must have material from each of the 4/5 units
- for the pale green box(es), they include a topic of their own choosing from the missing unit; subject to my approval. They were given lists of suggested topics.
- the blue squares are a free topic: they may choose any other topic as long as it is something that was covered in class; subject to my approval
Additional requirements for physics:
- at least three topics must include discussion of how they would find a mathematical prediction; all topics must discuss conceptual understanding
- there must be at least one practical demo
and for grade 9 science:
- Experimental design: they pick a topic from a list, which includes possible independent and dependent variables. They design an experiment to test the effects of changing one variable on another. They don’t need to perform the lab, but they will write it up as if they had, and set up a data table and graph for the results.
I wanted to keep it as PITA-free as I could for them, especially since some students had been having difficulties uploading the weekly videos to Flipgrid. I asked them to submit a rough draft or outline at least a week before the final due date so I could give feedback using Screencastify, and I made that part of the final mark so they would actually hand in a draft. (By the way, I'm going to blog about how much I loved making video comments on student drafts; you should absolutely try it.)
I started from TigerPhysics's grid and just made changes to reflect our curriculum. I took out the projects because the time restriction meant building/making anything was probably unrealistic, even if they could do it without leaving their homes. The green option boxes came about as I figured out which unit was missing from that row/column/diagonal. Of course, I've since realized that this is just a Sudoku board and could have saved myself some grief, but I kind of liked that it gave additional choice within a constraint.
Grade 9 science only has 4 units, but we wanted them to do a lab design since it was something we had been focussing on all year. Although they didn't have to do the lab, we picked experiments they could do at home if they had the equipment: paper helicopters, soap suds, bouncing balls, etc., with suggested independent and dependent variables. (These are experiments we ask them to design during the in-school lab exam, so fortunately that wasn't any extra work.)
There's some doubled and missing units in a few lines, again because I just started from Kevin's grid. For future use I've rejigged the unit distribution for 4/5/6 units and 4 units + lab design/build (which is just 5 units with some colour formatting) (so "unit" can be any grouping of content you wish, or a build/lab design/drawing/whatever you need). Each includes a free-choice box. If you want to make your own or need a different-sized board, dCode.xyz is the Sudoku-maker I used. Type 'Sudoku' into the search bar and choose your size. Click "Fill" and type single letters or digits in to represent the topic group (no spaces to get them lined up across the top of the board). Remember to tick the "Mode Sudoku X" box if you want the diagonals, choose one of the nifty shapes if you want to give the students even more choice, and click "Solve Sudoku". (Également, il est disponible en francais.)
I loved this project. I got some amazing things out of the students -- granted, they were the students who were still participating in the great online experiment of Spring 2020, but I'm definitely going to be doing it in the future. I particularly want to incorporate Mike Mohammed of @Mo_Physics's idea of using Bingo choice boards for student end-of-unit review; that way they have a base of video footage they can either revise or reuse at the end of the year. I also liked that in a course with different sections, where different teachers may have focussed on different topics to different degrees (no matter what we plan), each teacher could swap out a topic or two and still maintain the integrity of the assessment across classes.
Here's an example from a grade 11 student about Normal Forces (with a wee bit of possible miscommunication about N3, the normal force, and the force of gravity), posted with permission. The student chose to do their math in other topics, alas. For reference, in Ontario grade 11 physics deals primarily with 1D forces; we leave the math of inclined planes to grade 12. (The slides precede the video, which has no sound.)
(Newton is making a repeat appearance from the student's Newton's law video. And you bet I make them cite where they get their meme graphics from!)
Future thoughts: adding a build requirement to the project (or choice of build/lab design for physics), decreasing the amount of "other people's work" the senior grades are allowed to include, including 1-1 conferencing check-ins, working out how to do something similar for math courses, optional working with a partner on certain segments...
Resources: McPhee's Summative Bingo planner and emergency remote learning Assessments
Summative Choice Board planner
Grade 11 physics (SPH3U) remote learning summative assessment
